Comparison

A Gleap alternative for teams that only want the feedback part

Most comparisons on this site turn on native versus WebView. Here that is the smaller point. Gleap installs as a native SDK on Android and iOS, the two platforms fedo covers, and on several fedo does not, but the widget it opens is web content in a WebView. The bigger difference is scope, and what that scope costs.

Last checked against Gleap's public pricing: 12 October 2026. Documentation: 16 September 2026.

Gleap is a suite; the roadmap is one room in it

Gleap installs in web, iOS, Android, React Native, Expo, or Flutter and gives you a support surface. A user files a report and Gleap captures an annotated screenshot, console log, network log, session replay, and device metadata alongside it. On top of that sit an AI agent, live chat, a knowledge base, team inboxes, workflows, and outbound messaging.

Feature voting and a public roadmap are in there. They are also, by weight, a small part of what you are buying and what you are configuring.

If you want the suite, buy the suite. This page is not an argument that Gleap is bad — it is an argument that a suite is the wrong shape for some teams, and a bad deal for the ones who will only ever open one room in it.

When the suite is the wrong shape

• You do not want live chat in your app. A support widget is a promise to answer. A solo developer who adds one and then does not staff it has made the product worse, not better. fedo has no chat surface, so there is nothing to leave unanswered.
• You only want to know what to build next. The job is a list sorted by votes. Everything else is configuration you will click through once and never open again.
• $149/month is a real decision. For a side project or a pre-revenue app, a $1,788/year floor before your first user has voted on anything is a different question than it is for a funded team.
• You want to try voting tonight. Gleap's free plan does not include the roadmap. Team, which does, comes with a 7-day trial. When it ends you either pay or you rip the SDK out.

The price floor

Gleap's published pricing, billed annually: Free for one seat and one project, Team $149/month for unlimited seats and projects, Pro $299/month, and Enterprise from $999/month. Billed monthly the paid plans become $179, $359, and from $1,199. The AI agent is billed per resolution on top, $0.29 each, with token-based pricing as an alternative. Free covers live chat, in-app bug reporting, in-app surveys and 50 AI conversations a month; the feature roadmap, help center and session replays start on Team, which has a 7-day trial. Eligible early-stage companies can get 50% off Team or Pro for the first year through Gleap's startup programme.

fedo's Starter tier is free — one app, unlimited users, with a “Powered by fedo” badge shown in the feedback screen. Paid tiers are early access: you email for a price and it is locked at the rate you sign up at.

Per feature, Gleap is arguably the better value. Per feature you will actually use, that depends entirely on whether you wanted a support platform.

Where Gleap is clearly better

This list is longer than the one in fedo's favour, and pretending otherwise would waste your time:

• Platform coverage. Gleap ships native SDKs for iOS, Android, React Native, Expo, and Flutter, plus web, today. fedo has published Android and iOS, and has no Flutter SDK.
• What a bug report contains. Gleap attaches an annotated screenshot, console log, network log, session replay, and device metadata. fedo captures the text the user wrote, any properties you attach with setUserProperty, and a fixed set of device and app properties the SDK adds automatically (model, OS version, locale, app version and similar). For debugging, that is not a small gap.
• Support tooling. AI agent, live chat, knowledge base, team inboxes, workflows, outbound messaging. fedo has none of it and no plans you should count on.
• Compliance. SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA BAA, SSO, and BYOK on Enterprise. fedo has none of these.
• Maturity. Gleap has customers, a track record, and a support team. fedo is in early access with no public customer list, and its SDK has no offline retry yet.

Where fedo is the better fit

• Free to run indefinitely on one app, voting included. No trial clock, no card.
• One job. Feedback, votes, comments, five statuses. The integration is a Gradle line, one Fedo.initialize call, and the FedoFeedbackScreen() composable in your own navigation.
• No account needed to participate. The SDK creates an anonymous user on first open so people can post and vote immediately, and migrates them if they later sign in. How that works.
• No second product surface. Nothing that looks like a support channel, so nothing that implies a response time you have not committed to.

fedo vs Gleap, side by side

Gleap pricing from gleap.ai/pricing, checked 12 October 2026; other details from docs.gleap.ai, checked 16 September 2026. Pricing and features change — verify before you decide.

Which one to pick

Buy Gleap if you want a support channel as well as a roadmap, you need Flutter, you want rich bug reports with logs and replays, or you have compliance requirements. It does more, it does it on more platforms, and the price is reasonable for what it is.

Try fedo if the only question you have is what to build next, your app is Android or iOS, you want it free while you find out whether users will actually vote, and you would rather not add a support widget you have to staff.

Those are different products aimed at the same moment in a developer's week. Picking the smaller one is a bet that you will not need the rest — and if that bet turns out wrong, Gleap will still be there.

Common questions

Is Gleap better than fedo?

On capability, yes. Gleap ships more platforms, richer bug reports, live chat, an AI agent, a knowledge base, and enterprise compliance. fedo is smaller on purpose: in-app feedback, voting, comments, and five roadmap statuses. The reasons to choose fedo are its free tier, the absence of a support surface you would have to staff, and focus — not a longer feature list.

Does Gleap have a free plan?

Yes, but not with the roadmap. Gleap's Free plan covers one seat and one project with live chat, in-app bug reporting, in-app surveys and 50 AI conversations a month. Feature requests, votes and the public roadmap start on Team at $149 per month billed yearly, or $179 monthly, with a 7-day trial. Eligible early-stage companies can get 50% off Team or Pro for the first year through Gleap's startup programme.

Does Gleap support Flutter?

Yes. Gleap has native SDKs for iOS, Android, React Native, Expo, and Flutter, plus web. fedo has published Android and iOS and has no Flutter SDK. If you need Flutter, Gleap covers it and fedo does not.

What does fedo do that Gleap does not?

Run feature voting free, indefinitely, on one app; Gleap's free plan stops short of its roadmap. Beyond that the honest answer is not much — fedo is a narrower product. Its argument is that a narrower product is the right one when feature voting is the only job you have.

Other comparisons

• fedo vs Canny — the feedback portal whose mobile path is a WebView.
• fedo vs UserVoice — the enterprise platform that archived its mobile SDKs in 2019.
• All comparisons — the hub, plus tools without a write-up yet.
• In-app feedback beats a feedback portal — the argument underneath all three.